advertisement
FYI

Mercuriadis's 'Hot Seat' Interview Hits On An Uncomfortable Truth

In the most recent Celebrity Access feature, In the Hot Seat with Larry LeBlanc, global music titan Merck Mercuriadis tackles a thorny and often unspoken issue that plays into creators getting

Mercuriadis's 'Hot Seat' Interview Hits On An Uncomfortable Truth

By External Source

In the most recent Celebrity Access feature, In the Hot Seat with Larry LeBlanc, global music titan Merck Mercuriadis tackles a thorny and often unspoken issue that plays into creators getting the short end of the stick in the so-called ‘value gap’ chain in a lengthy interview that offers a fresh perspective on the bankability of copyrights. 


… Here’s what is not being said. When we look at the past 5 years of reporting, it would be fair to summarize it as neither Spotify nor Apple pay enough. That, to the greatest respect to the music industry, is not the full truth. Of course, we believe what Spotify pays currently or what Apple pays currently (for songs) is anemic to where we want it to be. But that’s not the truth.

advertisement

In terms of the songwriting community, the truth is that Spotify and Apple are keeping 30% of the money in exchange for the service that they provide. That is not a bad price to pay for the service that they provide. What is not fair is the split between recorded music and songs. And what is not fair is the influence that Sony, Universal, and Warner, as the three big recorded music companies, have over (their affiliated publishing companies).

Sony, Universal, and Warner which should be the three biggest advocates for songs because they are the three biggest song companies, but they cannot advocate to the degree that they should because they are owned by recorded music.

With recorded music (companies), you have 4/5th of the money going that way. They make a huge margin and, in general, they own the act (their recorded catalogs) in perpetuity; and then on the song side of the business, you’ve got 1/5th of the money going that way. They (affiliated major publishers) make a small margin in relative terms, and they don’t own the assets in perpetuity.

advertisement

– The complete interview can be found online here.

advertisement
Drake
Avec l'aimable autorisation d'OVO/Republic Records
Drake
Legal News

Drake Calls Kendrick Lamar’s Super Bowl Halftime Show Defamatory In Updated UMG Lawsuit

Drake's lawyers say the halftime show aimed to "assassinate the character of another artist," but UMG calls the updated case the latest "absurd" move by the superstar.

Drake has filed an updated version of his defamation lawsuit against Universal Music Group over Kendrick Lamar’s “Not Like Us,” claiming the rival’s Super Bowl halftime show was intended to “assassinate the character of another artist.”

In an amended complaint filed late Wednesday, Drake’s attorneys say the Super Bowl show, watched by 133 million people and “million of children”, “revitalized the public’s attention” to lyrics calling Drake a “certified pedophile” – a diss that the Canadian superstar claims is false and defamatory.

keep readingShow less
advertisement