advertisement
FYI

Mercuriadis's 'Hot Seat' Interview Hits On An Uncomfortable Truth

In the most recent Celebrity Access feature, In the Hot Seat with Larry LeBlanc, global music titan Merck Mercuriadis tackles a thorny and often unspoken issue that plays into creators getting

Mercuriadis's 'Hot Seat' Interview Hits On An Uncomfortable Truth

By External Source

In the most recent Celebrity Access feature, In the Hot Seat with Larry LeBlanc, global music titan Merck Mercuriadis tackles a thorny and often unspoken issue that plays into creators getting the short end of the stick in the so-called ‘value gap’ chain in a lengthy interview that offers a fresh perspective on the bankability of copyrights. 


… Here’s what is not being said. When we look at the past 5 years of reporting, it would be fair to summarize it as neither Spotify nor Apple pay enough. That, to the greatest respect to the music industry, is not the full truth. Of course, we believe what Spotify pays currently or what Apple pays currently (for songs) is anemic to where we want it to be. But that’s not the truth.

advertisement

In terms of the songwriting community, the truth is that Spotify and Apple are keeping 30% of the money in exchange for the service that they provide. That is not a bad price to pay for the service that they provide. What is not fair is the split between recorded music and songs. And what is not fair is the influence that Sony, Universal, and Warner, as the three big recorded music companies, have over (their affiliated publishing companies).

Sony, Universal, and Warner which should be the three biggest advocates for songs because they are the three biggest song companies, but they cannot advocate to the degree that they should because they are owned by recorded music.

With recorded music (companies), you have 4/5th of the money going that way. They make a huge margin and, in general, they own the act (their recorded catalogs) in perpetuity; and then on the song side of the business, you’ve got 1/5th of the money going that way. They (affiliated major publishers) make a small margin in relative terms, and they don’t own the assets in perpetuity.

advertisement

– The complete interview can be found online here.

advertisement
University of Alberta Study Finds 87% of Canadian Musicians View Generative AI ‘Negatively’
Photo by Erwi on Unsplash
Tech

University of Alberta Study Finds 87% of Canadian Musicians View Generative AI ‘Negatively’

The Western Canadian university surveyed 263 Canadian musicians about their thoughts on AI’s rampant rise and the use of streaming services as an artistic tool.

A new study from the University of Alberta surveyed 263 “working Canadian musicians,” asking them about their experiences working in the evolving music industry. As respondents discussed an increase in the industry’s tech advancements, namely generative AI, many were not optimistic.

Of the 142 participants who highlighted the rapid use of AI, 87% viewed it “negatively.” Many shared they are actively avoiding the tool in their music, with some explaining that it’s devaluing human-made work. As AI continues to affect the music industry, participants say that it’s becoming a challenge to bring in new listeners and earn a livable wage.

keep readingShow less
advertisement