advertisement
Legal News

Drake Sued for Endorsing ‘Unlawful’ Gambling Platform: ‘Deeply Fraudulent’

A Missouri man says Drake and streamer Adin Ross promoted the online casino Stake, thereby "glamorizing the platform to millions of impressionable fans."

Drake Sued for Endorsing ‘Unlawful’ Gambling Platform: ‘Deeply Fraudulent’
Drake watches on as the Sacramento Kings play the Toronto Raptors during the second half of their basketball game at the Scotiabank Arena on November 2, 2024 in Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Mark Blinch/Getty Images

Drake and online streamer Adin Ross are facing a class action lawsuit accusing them of promoting illegal gambling by endorsing the online sweepstake casino Stake.

In a case filed Monday (Oct. 27), lawyers for a Missouri man say Drake, Ross and Stake engaged in “deceptive, fraudulent and unfair” practices in the state — and that Champagne Papi used his massive celebrity to “encourage impressionable users to gamble.”


“Drake’s role as Stake’s unofficial mascot is quietly corrosive — he’s glamorizing the platform to millions of impressionable fans, many of whom treat his wild betting habits like gospel,” write lawyers for plaintiff Justin Killham.

advertisement

Stake is a so-called sweepstakes casino that operates on a “dual currency” system, which critics say is designed to evade gambling regulations. Such platforms sell “gold coins” that they claim are purely for entertainment, then offer separate free “sweeps coins” that can be redeemed for cash, meaning neither constitutes full-fledged gambling. California, New Jersey and other states have moved to rein in the practice, either with new legislation or beefed-up enforcement of existing state gambling laws.

The case filed Monday claims that Stake, a Curaçao-based livestream gambling platform, violated Missouri’s gambling laws with that kind of system. The site tried to mislead consumers, the lawsuit claims, “into believing it offers harmless gameplay instead of an unlawful gambling platform.”

The complaint also claims that the company paid Drake and Ross millions to promote that illegal operation. But lawyers for the plaintiffs say the stars have done so under “deeply fraudulent pretenses,” including fronting the stars’ “house money” to risk.

“When Ross and Drake purport to gamble online with Stake.com, they often do not do so with their own money despite telling the public in Missouri and elsewhere the opposite,” Killham’s lawyers write. “Stake’s and Drake’s and Ross’s conduct here threatens the welfare of Missouri residents and especially its young people.”

advertisement

Representatives for Drake and Stake did not return Billboard‘s requests for comment by press time. A representative for Ross could not immediately be located.

This article was originally published by Billboard PRO.

advertisement
Penny Harrison and her son Parker Harrison rally against the live entertainment ticket industry outside the U.S. Capitol January 24, 2023 in Washington, DC.
Drew Angerer/Getty Images

Penny Harrison and her son Parker Harrison rally against the live entertainment ticket industry outside the U.S. Capitol January 24, 2023 in Washington, DC.

Legal News

Live Nation Lost Its Monopoly Trial. What’s Next — and Could Ticketmaster Really Be Sold?

As the dust settles on a jury's antitrust verdict against Live Nation, Billboard unpacks what's next in the high-stakes legal battle.

A jury in New York has found that Live Nation runs an unlawful monopoly that touches multiple corners of the concert industry. But it will take some time before we find out the consequences.

The blockbuster verdict, which came down on Wednesday (April 15) after a monthlong trial and four days of jury deliberations, is limited to findings of liability. That means jurors were asked only to decide whether Live Nation monopolized the market for primary concert ticketing and unlawfully required artists to use its promotion services in order to play its amphitheaters — and they answered a resounding “yes” on all counts.

keep readingShow less
advertisement